Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 29, 2015 at 11:56 comment added user3871 BTW, attaching all those screenshots is unnecessary. All you need to do is use tools like apt-cache or aptitude and paste the appropriate lines of output. It will be much easier to digest.
Mar 29, 2015 at 11:55 answer added user3871 timeline score: 1
Mar 24, 2015 at 14:29 answer added Tyler timeline score: 4
Mar 24, 2015 at 13:44 comment added Tim @Tom it does. Ubuntu software update says the installed version is 24.4-1 (see the list). Before I installed, there is no emacs. I created a deb package from the compiled source, and then dpkg, which I believe let Ubuntu and dpkg knows the installed emacs.
Mar 24, 2015 at 13:37 comment added user295 Ubuntu knows about the installed files, but not that this custom package replaces the system emacs packages (if you didn't build the package with the information to let the system know)
Mar 24, 2015 at 12:53 history edited Tim CC BY-SA 3.0
added 33 characters in body
Mar 24, 2015 at 12:47 comment added Tim But I used checkinstall and dpkg instead of make install to install my emacs, so dpkg and ubuntu knows about it. I wonder why Ubuntu software update suggests me another version of emacs, if my installed one is the latest.
Mar 24, 2015 at 12:47 history edited Tim CC BY-SA 3.0
added 89 characters in body
Mar 24, 2015 at 12:44 comment added wvxvw If you compiled it on your own, then Ubuntu's package manager doesn't know about it. If you will proceed with the installation from the package manager, it will install a separate Emacs. There's no problem in having more than one Emacs, except for having to share the init file, it's easy to contain each installation to its own code, but both Emacs will be able to use each others Lisp code (if you set them to do that). If you are happy with building Emacs on your own, then, I'd keep on doing that, but if it sounds bothersome, then I'd install one from PPA.
Mar 24, 2015 at 12:25 history asked Tim CC BY-SA 3.0