Skip to main content
added 1 character in body
Source Link
elethan
  • 4.9k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 56

Unfortunately, this is a one of a few documented side effects of having your custom time stamps overlaid on top of the default time stamps. From the documentaion:

If the custom timestamp format is longer than the default and you are using dates in tables, table alignment will be messed up. If the custom format is shorter, things do work as expected.

You could try to shorten your custom format, but other than that, you are probably out of luck. Also, notnote that the dates in your example table do not match your custom format. If you hand typed these dates, note that you can add a timestamp automatically in an org-mode buffer with C-. (org-time-stamp).

Unfortunately, this is a one of a few documented side effects of having your custom time stamps overlaid on top of the default time stamps. From the documentaion:

If the custom timestamp format is longer than the default and you are using dates in tables, table alignment will be messed up. If the custom format is shorter, things do work as expected.

You could try to shorten your custom format, but other than that, you are probably out of luck. Also, not that the dates in your example table do not match your custom format. If you hand typed these dates, note that you can add a timestamp automatically in an org-mode buffer with C-. (org-time-stamp).

Unfortunately, this is a one of a few documented side effects of having your custom time stamps overlaid on top of the default time stamps. From the documentaion:

If the custom timestamp format is longer than the default and you are using dates in tables, table alignment will be messed up. If the custom format is shorter, things do work as expected.

You could try to shorten your custom format, but other than that, you are probably out of luck. Also, note that the dates in your example table do not match your custom format. If you hand typed these dates, note that you can add a timestamp automatically in an org-mode buffer with C-. (org-time-stamp).

Post Undeleted by elethan
added 329 characters in body
Source Link
elethan
  • 4.9k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 56

To realign org-tables regardlessUnfortunately, this is a one of a few documented side effects of having your custom time stamps overlaid on top of the data indefault time stamps. From the cellsdocumentaion:

If the custom timestamp format is longer than the default and you are using dates in tables, table alignment will be messed up. If the custom format is shorter, things do work as expected.

You could try to shorten your custom format, hit C-c C-c within a cellbut other than that, you are probably out of luck. This should automatically realign allAlso, not that the infodates in your tables. I tried it with your example table do not match your custom format. If you hand typed these dates, and it worked finenote that you can add a timestamp automatically in an org-mode buffer with C-. (org-time-stamp).

To realign org-tables regardless of the data in the cells, hit C-c C-c within a cell. This should automatically realign all the info in your tables. I tried it with your example table, and it worked fine.

Unfortunately, this is a one of a few documented side effects of having your custom time stamps overlaid on top of the default time stamps. From the documentaion:

If the custom timestamp format is longer than the default and you are using dates in tables, table alignment will be messed up. If the custom format is shorter, things do work as expected.

You could try to shorten your custom format, but other than that, you are probably out of luck. Also, not that the dates in your example table do not match your custom format. If you hand typed these dates, note that you can add a timestamp automatically in an org-mode buffer with C-. (org-time-stamp).

Post Deleted by elethan
Source Link
elethan
  • 4.9k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 56

To realign org-tables regardless of the data in the cells, hit C-c C-c within a cell. This should automatically realign all the info in your tables. I tried it with your example table, and it worked fine.