Timeline for Emacs setup for LaTeX after (use-package) verse
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2017 at 17:42 | comment | added | jue |
@doctorate defun in :init or :preface: I think in your case it makes no difference, because with it, only a function is defined. It is defined before everything else, that way it is already defined when it is needed.
|
|
| Jul 17, 2017 at 17:38 | comment | added | jue |
@doctorate with progn it is possible to cluster multiple instructions and stuff them where only one is allowed, use-package is doing this for you already, so it is not needed. (use-package reftex ...) I just did not change it, so I did not write it again.
|
|
| Jul 17, 2017 at 15:23 | vote | accept | doctorate | ||
| Jul 17, 2017 at 12:32 | comment | added | doctorate |
I noticed also that you removed the (use-package reftex...) altogether, can you share you idea pls, why was that?
|
|
| Jul 17, 2017 at 12:28 | comment | added | doctorate |
I wonder which use case progn would be necessary to use? I noticed that you removed it already. Another question, is what difference would be if (defun...) macro were put in the :init block or the :preface block? How can someone tell which keyword to take here?
|
|
| Jul 17, 2017 at 9:54 | history | answered | jue | CC BY-SA 3.0 |