0

I've been interested in trying out Quack mode in my Scheme environment recently, but have been running into some problems with its keyword documentation. According to quack.el, invoking quack-view-keyword-docs should allow me to view the manual documentation for a given keyword, although it currently only works for PLT manuals. Nonetheless, when I do invoke said function with a given keyword, say xml, I get the following series of errors:

Quack Warning: Manual plt-mzscheme has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-mzlib has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-mred has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-framework has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-drscheme has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-insidemz has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-tools has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-mzc has no HTML.
Quack Warning: Manual plt-r5rs has no HTML.
Sorry, no documentation found for keyword "xml".

This isn't making sense to me since I have supplied the quack-pltcollect-dirs variable with my collects directory like so:

(quote ("/Applications/Racket v6.5/collects"))

I did this as per the instructions in quack.el:

Note to PLT Scheme users: If you do not already have the PLT manuals installed, they can be downloaded from http://download.plt-scheme.org/doc/ and installed in your PLT doc collection. If Quack is not finding installed PLT manuals, then be sure that the quack-pltcollect-dirs variable contains the appropriate collection directory (if it does not, then either set the PLTHOME and/or PLTCOLLECTS environment variables appropriately, or set quack-pltcollect-dirs).

I'm not exactly sure what I'm missing here that is causing Quack mode to fail every time I try to look up the docs for a keyword. Btw, I am using Emacs 25.1 on OS X 10.11.4.

4
  • I suspect the fact that this mode has been written for Emacs 23 (and been tested with manuals of the same age) has to do with it...
    – wasamasa
    May 8, 2016 at 11:18
  • @wasamasa Hmm, I didn't even realize that; that may indeed be a problem. Tbh, I've quite given up on making this particular package work and have had more success with the (seemingly) similar geiser package, but I'll leave this question open in case anyone finds a solution.
    – GDP2
    May 9, 2016 at 15:47
  • I think the organization of the documentation has changed a lot since PLT Scheme was reborn as Racket (which was in 2010-ish).
    – molbdnilo
    May 26, 2016 at 18:42
  • @molbdnilo Quite possible; I have no reference for comparison, though, since I've only seen the Racket docs.
    – GDP2
    May 26, 2016 at 18:51

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.