0

My package-archive variable is set to:

(("melpa-stable" . "http://stable.melpa.org/packages/")
 ("melpa" . "http://melpa.org/packages/")
 ("marmalade" . "http://marmalade-repo.org/packages/")
 ("gnu" . "http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/"))

which means that most packages appear twice or more in my package-list-packages output. Can this be avoided? Can this be avoided in a smart way?

Here's an example output :

  abl-mode           0.9.0         available  marmalade  Python TDD minor mode
  abl-mode           20170604.1309 available  melpa      Python TDD minor mode
  ac-R               0.2           available  marmalade  Autocompletion routines for R
  ac-cider           0.2.0         available  marmalade  Clojure auto-complete sources using CIDER
  ac-cider           0.2.3         available  melpa-s... Clojure auto-complete sources using CIDER
  ac-cider           20161006.19   available  melpa      Clojure auto-complete sources using CIDER
  ac-geiser          0.1           available  melpa-s... Auto-complete backend for geiser
  ac-geiser          0.1           available  marmalade  Auto-complete backend for geiser
  ac-geiser          20130928.2347 available  melpa      Auto-complete backend for geiser

I'd like to see this instead:

  abl-mode           0.9.0         available  marmalade  Python TDD minor mode
  ac-R               0.2           available  marmalade  Autocompletion routines for R
  ac-cider           0.2.3         available  melpa-s... Clojure auto-complete sources using CIDER
  ac-geiser          0.1           available  marmalade  Auto-complete backend for geiser

In this case I favoured marmalade and melpa-stable over melpa. Between marmalade and melpa-stable, I picked whichever had the higher version number.

A workaround would be to add an entry in package-pinned-packages for every package available, but that sounds very unsatisfying.

1 Answer 1

1

What you probably want is a combination of package-archive-priorities with package-menu-hide-low-priority set to t. Actually, just the second one will be sufficient for most cases.

EDIT:

To clarify: package-menu-hide-low-priority set to t will make package select only the highest-version variant in case package is available in multiple archives UNLESS package-archive-priorities implies different priorities.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.