0

I am reading the Intro to Lisp Programing and got to the chapter where switch-to-buffer is introduced.

I tried to bind (switch-to-buffer "*scratch*") via global-set-key

But this does not work:

(global-set-key (kbd "<S-f11>") '(switch-to-buffer "*scratch*"))

I looked at Bernt Hansens config and he defined an extra function for this.

(defun bh/switch-to-scratch ()
  (interactive)
  (switch-to-buffer "*scratch*"))

Why is this necessary?

1

The following demonstrates the most commonly used method to define a keyboard shortcut using global-set-key. The function bh/switch-to-scratch is okay "as-is". Keep in mind that we are defining SHIFT+F11 in this example:

(defun bh/switch-to-scratch ()
  (interactive)
  (switch-to-buffer "*scratch*"))

(global-set-key (kbd "<S-f11>") 'bh/switch-to-scratch)

Alternatively, we could use the following -- keeping in mind that Emacs requires that functions activated via keyboard shortcuts be interactive, and lambda is required to make this example work:

(global-set-key (kbd "<S-f11>") (lambda () (interactive) (switch-to-buffer "*scratch*")))
| improve this answer | |
  • I see, thank you. Is there a "better" way or are they both equally suited? – breathe_in_breathe_out Aug 8 at 21:05
  • 2
    If it is for your own setup, either way is fine. If you are developing a library for others to use, then the first method is the most common and users will expect to see something like that. That being said, I have seen popular libraries that still define a few keyboard shortcuts using the second method. When you type C-h k aka M-x describe-key, the *Help* buffer is a little cleaner looking (in my opinion) using the first method and one can still jump to where the function is defined (if so desired). – lawlist Aug 8 at 21:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.