2

I am often opening exwm buffers by running async-shell-command but unfortunately these buffers always get named *EXWM*. It would be great if when I ran async-shell-command 'firefox the buffer that gets created would be named firefox.

Improve this question
3
  • 1
    I don't use EXWM, but async-shell-command accepts extra optional parameters. The second parameter is the name you want for the buffer with the results.
    – darcamo
    Dec 14, 2020 at 22:38
  • @darcamo: Please consider posting that as an answer.
    – Drew
    Dec 15, 2020 at 17:07
  • please note that I am seeking a complete elisp function.
    – Nicholas Hubbard
    Dec 15, 2020 at 20:29

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
0

something like this could work...

(defun async-shell-to-buffer (cmd)
  (interactive "sCall command: ")
  (let ((output-buffer (generate-new-buffer (format "*async:%s*" cmd)))
        (error-buffer  (generate-new-buffer (format "*error:%s*" cmd))))
    (async-shell-command cmd output-buffer error-buffer)))

then it's possible to call (async-shell-to-buffer "firefox")

Improve this answer
3
  • this behaves exactly the same for me as async-shell-command
    – Nicholas Hubbard
    Dec 16, 2020 at 0:35
  • in the *Buffer List* i get *async:firefox* and *error:firefox* so might be something else exwm is doing?
    – zzkt
    Dec 16, 2020 at 2:51
  • maybe try rename-buffer in a function advising exwm-manage--manage-window looks like that's where it's creating new buffers...
    – zzkt
    Dec 16, 2020 at 2:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.