Does elisp have regexp literals?

Question

The sheer number of backslashes my regexps require is pretty crazy. Does elisp have regexp literals, so I can write something like

rx"some\(regexp\)"

instead of

"some\\(regexp\\)"

Emacs highlights some regexp constructs like \\|, \$, and \$. Unfortunately, in many themes this isn't visible. You can override font-lock-regexp-grouping-backslash and font-lock-regexp-grouping-construct to make this more distinct. — Lindydancer, Feb 9 '15 at 5:58
I've made a patch to support raw string literals but the devs are not interested. — knarf, Feb 9 '15 at 10:28
You can always tweak how things are displayed, as in this blog post by @abo-abo: oremacs.com/2015/01/11/pretty-elisp-regex — glucas, Feb 9 '15 at 13:08
@knarf it's a shame that Stefan wasn't interested in raw string support, because raw strings would be a complement for a new regexp syntax (which I would be in favor of), not a replacement. — nosefrog, Feb 10 '15 at 0:18

glucas · Accepted Answer · 2015-02-09 13:14:05Z

13

One option is to use the rx macro to construct your expressions using sexps.

Your example becomes (rx "some" (group "regexp"))

Here are a couple more examples from the commentary section in rx.el, to get an idea of how rx works:

This ^;;\\s-*\n\\|^\n becomes

(rx (or (and line-start ";;" (0+ space) ?\n)
        (and line-start ?\n)))

This [ \t\n]*:\$[^:]+\\|$\$ becomes

(rx (and (zero-or-more (in " \t\n")) ":"
         (submatch (or line-end (one-or-more (not (any ?:)))))))

answered Feb 8 '15 at 22:40

glucas

16.1k1 gold badge33 silver badges64 bronze badges

2

Thanks for the edit @knarf! I was on my phone and didn't want to put in an example that I might get wrong. :-) – glucas Feb 9 '15 at 13:01
We are actually in the process of moving many scripts that use lots of regex search and replace from perl to elisp because of the rx syntax, which makes them easier to maintain. Imho, for similar cases, rx syntax by itself makes elisp a well-worthy substitute for perl python, ruby, etc. Thank you. – gsl Apr 10 '16 at 7:37

add a comment |

Jordon Biondo · Accepted Answer · 2015-02-09 16:55:50Z

7

No it does not have regexp literals, but many find pcre2el to be a helpful alternative.

Specifically using it from elisp like this:

(rxt-pcre-to-elisp "(abc|def)\\w+\\d+")
   ;; => "\\(\\(?:abc\\|def\\)\\)[_[:alnum:]]+[[:digit:]]+"

answered Feb 9 '15 at 1:15

Jordon Biondo

11k2 gold badges27 silver badges56 bronze badges

That still requires you to double your backslashes. You just don't need quite as many for the average regexp. – cjm May 5 '15 at 16:41

add a comment |

2 Answers 2