When I evaluate (local-key-binding key) for any arbitrary key that does not have a local binding, I expect a return value of nil, but I almost always get a 1. If the key actually does have a local binding (say from a major mode) in the current buffer, then local-key-binding behaves as expected and returns the function to which the key is bound.

My question then, is why does local-key-binding often return 1 when there is in fact no local binding for the given key?

As an example, after opening emacs with emacs -Q, type

(key-binding (kbd "C-h h"))
(local-key-binding (kbd "C-h h"))

in the scratch buffer and evaluate each of the forms. Notice that key-binding returns view-hello-file, and local-key-binding return 1. The binding for C-h h is defined globally, not locally, so I expect local-key-binding to return nil. Now try

(local-set-key (kbd "C-h h") 'describe-bindings)
(key-binding (kbd "C-h h"))
(local-key-binding (kbd "C-h h"))

and evaluate each of the forms. Notice that both key-binding and local-key-binding return describe-bindings. Now try

(local-unset-key (kbd "C-h h"))
(key-binding (kbd "C-h h"))
(local-key-binding (kbd "C-h h"))

and evaluate each of the forms. Notice that key-binding has gone back to view-hello-file, and local-key-binding now shows nil.

  • 2
    Please provide an example that fits your criterion and produces the result you are not expecting.
    – Drew
    Commented Oct 9, 2014 at 2:55

1 Answer 1


local-key-binding uses lookup-key whose doc-string contains this:

A number as value means KEY is "too long"; that is, characters or symbols in it except for the last one fail to be a valid sequence of prefix characters in KEYMAP. The number is how many characters at the front of KEY it takes to reach a non-prefix key.

local-unset-key does not reverse the effect of local-key-binding, because it does not actually do what its doc-string claims it does:

Remove local binding of KEY

But what actually happens boils down to:

(define-key (current-local-map) "\C-hh" nil)

(One could argue that it does what the doc-string claims, but it certainly doesn't do what one would expect when first reading that doc-string).

The keymap went through these stages:

(keymap (8 keymap (104 . describe-bindings))))
(keymap (8 keymap (104)))

To remove the binding for a key instead of re-binding it to nil you can use kmu-remove-key from my library keymap-utils.

When a key is bound to nil in a local keymap that prevents key lookup to consider the binding in the parent keymap, but it does not override the global binding.

  • So why does local-unset-key seem to "fix" the problem? Isn't KEY still "too long" for KEYMAP?
    – nispio
    Commented Oct 9, 2014 at 4:34
  • Okay, thanks for the edit. I think that clears things up somewhat. So when local-key-binding returns a number, it is not a bug, but a feature. Is that what I am learning? It seems like a strange feature. If the key is not bound in the local map, why would you ever want the function to return anything but nil?
    – nispio
    Commented Oct 9, 2014 at 7:01
  • 1
    Well returning nil or an integer tells you "how much" the key is unbound. nil means C-h h is unbound (i.e. there is no entry for C-h h) and so is C-h, while 1 means C-h h is unbound but C-h is bound. It's unfortunate that nil can also mean C-h h is bound - to nil.
    – tarsius
    Commented Oct 10, 2014 at 0:14
  • Are there other functions out there that are actually using this information? It still seems weird to return a value that means "That key isn't bound, but it is really close to being bound."
    – nispio
    Commented Oct 10, 2014 at 0:28
  • I don't know. But I assume there is a reason for this :-)
    – tarsius
    Commented Oct 10, 2014 at 0:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.