This question is a follow-up to [this answer][1] (q.v.). I understand that Emacs interprets <kbd>esc</kbd> as `M-` only when the keystroke that follows it corresponds to a "character" (e.g. <kbd>A</kbd>, <kbd>5</kbd>, <kbd>;</kbd>, etc.), as opposed to, e.g., <kbd>←</kbd>, <kbd>F5</kbd>, <kbd>home</kbd>, etc. What can I add to my `.emacs` file to extend the <kbd>esc</kbd> ⇒ `M-` interpretation to the case where the following key is a "non-character" key? --- OK, the following snippet takes care of my immediate problem, **but it's not an answer to my question** (see below): (add-hook 'org-mode-hook (lambda () (define-key org-mode-map [27 S-down] 'org-shiftmetadown) (define-key org-mode-map [27 S-up] 'org-shiftmetaup) (define-key org-mode-map [27 S-right] 'org-shiftmetaright) (define-key org-mode-map [27 S-left] 'org-shiftmetaleft) (define-key org-mode-map [27 down] 'org-metadown) (define-key org-mode-map [27 up] 'org-metaup) (define-key org-mode-map [27 right] 'org-metaright) (define-key org-mode-map [27 left] 'org-metaleft) (define-key org-mode-map [27 return] 'org-meta-return) (define-key org-mode-map [27 S-return] 'org-insert-todo-heading))) To find the bindings I needed to define, I got a listing of `org-mode-map` (with `C-h v`), and searched for `M-` to get all the bindings beginning with `M-`: (M-S-down . org-shiftmetadown) (M-S-up . org-shiftmetaup) (M-S-right . org-shiftmetaright) (M-S-left . org-shiftmetaleft) (M-down . org-metadown) (M-up . org-metaup) (M-right . org-metaright) (M-left . org-metaleft) (M-return . org-meta-return) (M-S-return . org-insert-todo-heading) Each one of these lines is the basis for a corresponding `define-key` expression in the mode-hook shown above. The transformation should be pretty obvious. (The 27 in the `define-key` expressions is the code for <kbd>esc</kbd>.) One would need to do this sort of thing for every single mode *X* that defines a key binding of the form `M-` followed by a non-character key sequence. Specifically, for every such binding, one would have to include a `define-key` expression in a mode-hook for mode *X*. Therefore, this approach is obviously a very laborious, fragile, and hard-to-maintain hack. It does not do what the question requests, but instead painstakingly simulates it for certain special cases. For this reason I did not post it as an answer, in the hopes that someone will post an actual answer to the original question. [1]: http://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/3991/882