Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with setq
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 15482
1
vote
1
answer
53
views
Inconsistency in emacs' rules of scope?
In the
emacs manual page for setq (https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/eintr/Using-setq.html), it is
stated that setq is exactly the same as using set followed by a
quote, but the following … a "one") ;; Global variable
(let ((a "two")) ;; Local variable
(setq a "three") ;; Using "setq" affected the LOCAL variable "a"
a)) ;; Return local variable a
=> …
- 859