0

In order to summarise my work for certain projects I use Org's clock tables:

 #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope agenda-with-archives :block 2015-Q1 :tags "ProjectA"  :fileskip0
 #+END:

This summarises the time spent in the first quarter of 2015. However, today I tried to do this for Q3 and it seems to (partially) fail. as you can see below it Org lists the entries of Q4:

#+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope agenda-with-archives :block 2015-Q3 :tags "ProjectA"  :fileskip0
#+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2015-10-13 di 10:51], for 4th quarter of 2015.
| File               | Headline             |   Time |      |
|--------------------+----------------------+--------+------|
|                    | ALL *Total time*     | *2:08* |      |
|--------------------+----------------------+--------+------|
| todo.org           | *File time*          | *1:34* |      |
|                    | Programming          |   0:36 |      |
|                    | \_  support forum    |        | 0:36 |
|                    | Courses              |   0:58 |      |
|                    | \_  school 2016      |        | 0:58 |
|--------------------+----------------------+--------+------|
| todo_ProjectA.org  | *File time*          | *0:34* |      |
|                    | Financial            |   0:21 |      |
|                    | \_  Progress reports |        | 0:21 |
|                    | WP4                  |   0:13 |      |
|                    | \_  User support     |        | 0:13 |
#+END:

Changing Q3 to Q2 or Q1 gives the same result. It looks like the calculation of quarters is broken. I guess this may have to do with my upgrading Org-mode to 8.3 about a month ago.

Did anyone experience this too or is it something with my setup?

[edit] I upgraded to org 20151005 from the package repo and the problem persists.

[edit 2] Using Org 8.2.10 I get the correct result, so this indeed seems to be a bug.

1 Answer 1

1

This was indeed a bug. After upgrading to the Org package of 20151116, the calendar works OK again.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.