Evaluating a string of elisp code is a two-stage process: you need to parse the string using read-from-string and then evaluate the resulting Lisp expression with eval.
(defun my-eval-string (string)
"Evaluate elisp code stored in a string."
(eval (car (read-from-string string))))
Now (my-eval-string "(+ 1 2)") evaluates to 3.
As pointed out by ...
It looks like Emacs simply reads (. 123) as 123, what happened?
That's exactly what happened. To back it up with sources:
if (ch == '.')
if (!NILP (tail))
XSETCDR (tail, read0 (readcharfun));
val = read0 (readcharfun);
read1 (readcharfun, &ch, 0);
if (ch == ')')
if (doc_reference == 1)
That is a struct of elfeed-entry (defined by elfeed). The #s here means struct. The first one is for elfeed-entry, the second is for elfeed-ref.
(cl-defstruct website name shortname url shorturl)
(make-website :name "StackOverflow"
;; => #s(website "StackOverflow" nil "https://stackoverflow.com/" nil)
This is a better approach I think.
(with-current-buffer (find-file-noselect "foo.el")
If you want to wrap this as you describe below, and excecute it, try this:
(defmacro my-read (fname)
,(with-current-buffer (find-file-noselect fname)
The answer of Constantine is okay.
Just to provide a slight modification:
(defun my-eval-string (str)
"Read and evaluate all forms in str.
Return the results of all forms as a list."
(let ((next 0)
(setq ret (cons (funcall (lambda (ret)
(setq next (cdr ...
ELISP> (read "(a b c)")
(a b c)
ELISP> (read "(9 . 3)")
(9 . 3)
If by (9 . 3) you mean you'd like a cons, then my answer would work. Note however if you actually would like a dot, my answer not so much.
See Drew's answer to a related question.
If you do not mind ignoring all errors (I do not know which errors read might signal), you should use ignore-errors. Otherwise, your error handler should probably be specific to end-of-file errors.
Personally, I take (sometimes guilty) pleasure in K&R-style and functional brevity, so I would write your function ...
You apparently want to read a character and immediately dispatch behavior based on what it is.
Help > Search Documentation > Find Any Object by Name (command apropos) tells you, for read plus char tells you about function read-char.
C-h f read-char:
read-char is a built-in function in `C source code'.
(read-char &optional PROMPT INHERIT-INPUT-...
If you want evaluation to return nil when it would normally raise an error, wrap the sexp to be evaluated in ignore-errors:
(ignore-errors (read-from-string contents pos))
See also with-demoted-errors.
If your file contains just one lisp form, all you need to do is
(setq v (read (f-read-text "s.el")))
(see Input Functions).
If there are several forms, like (a b) (c d), you will need to read in cycle using read-from-string or do
(read (concat "(" my-string ")"))
Based on John Kitchin's solution, I come up with the following solution which inserts the needed text before and after the file contents:
The answer to any "Is it possible" question is almost always yes (there is a theorem by Turing which tells us the limit of what is computable, but in practice people rarely come up against that limit). It is better to rephrase this type of question to ask how to do something, rather than merely if it is possible, since that's usually what most people mean by ...
You're still going need to read the entire file, but you don't have to process
every line, since you need just first N lines.
(defun your-read-lines (file n)
"Return first N lines of FILE."
(cl-loop repeat n
collect (prog1 (buffer-substring-no-...
Yes, use interactive with a Lisp sexp, not a literal string. You can't specify particular defaulting with a literal string arg.
You can use read-from-minibuffer, read-string, or completing-read.
Provide the value returned by (thing-at-point 'word) as the DEFAULT-VALUE argument to one of those functions, not the INITIAL-CONTENTS argument.
(You can use the ...